Articles written by our members or of special interest We welcome your comments! February 24, 2016 False choices By Ken Burrows Conservative columnist Star Parker, whos known for embracing creationism over evolution and who has called public schools godless cesspools, is fond of declaring that America faces mutually exclusive religious vs. secular existential alternatives, and only the religious option can save the country. Of same-sex marriage, she wrote in 2013 that it contradicts biblical tradition, which she insists our laws must be based on, and concluded: We have only two options. Turn back to where we belong or watch the continuing collapse of our country. Implying we belong in a biblically dominated state. Last month she reprised this theocratic-leaning dialectics by insisting that secularism in government is changing what America is about and then declared another of her stark choices by asking: Are we going to be secular and socialist or a God-fearing free people? This latter rhetorical query assumes that only the God-fearing can be free, and it intimates that secular government is not what America is about. Both are demonstrably untrue. When the Founders tackled the issue of religious freedomarguably the single most distinguishing component their new experiment in liberty would embracethey advocated relentlessly for a secular government. Not to diminish religion or religious freedom but to protect it. They knew that societies tend to descend into turmoil, even self-destruction, when the power of a religious institution is aligned with the government. Moreover, on a practical level, there is no intrinsic equation between religiosity and freedom. It can, quite often, be quite the contrary. Past popes labeled freedom of conscience anathema if it led one to question church doctrine. Religious leaders were among the defenders of slavery in the 1800s and among the critics of the civil rights movement in the 1960s. Today we see increasing efforts to restrict rights and discriminate against others under claims of religious freedom. Because they dont conform to her biblical worldview, Parker herself opposes same-sex marriage, abortion, birth control and divorceeven though all are matters of individual liberty. On the other hand, non-religious people and entities are often freedoms major defenders. In generations past, freethinkers were among the leaders in the abolitionist and womens suffrage movements. Today the American Humanist Association lists among its aspirations the upholding of equal enjoyment of human rights and civil liberties. Noted humanist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Andrei Sakharov defended liberties at great personal cost in Soviet Russia. The point here is not to say that either the religious or the secular have monopolies on protecting or constricting freedom, or on representing the best or worst in our nature. There are always good and bad players in any given cohort. But to suggest that only a God-fearing stance is compatible with freedom does not hold up to scrutiny. To suggest that the continuing viability of America requires turning back the clock to an imagined biblically dictated government does not square with history. Indeed, the Framers specifically sought to prevent that very thing. Parker sees our polarization and concludes deference to religion is the only way to affirm what the nation is about. She quoted Abraham Lincolns observation that a house divided against itself cannot stand, and so, she said, we have to make hard choices. But instead she presents us the secular and socialist vs. God-fearing free dichotomy. Thats not a hard choice. Its a false one.
January, 2016 Tragedy by Groff Schroeder Imagine a 1960s Twilight Zone episode in which a physician
discovers that a popular and profitable home safety product is actually
a deadly macroscopic communicable disease agent. Despite horrific public
events, more and more people find the marketing so compelling, and the
product so attractive, that they not only seek out the pathogenic agent
but also pay handsomely for it. Meanwhile, after scientifically demonstrating
the danger and exposing a rapidly unfolding epidemic caused by the product,
the physician is discredited by personal attacks. Intimidating product
supporters stalk the physician, and suppliers bribe government officials
to prohibit all physicians from initiating any conversation that might
warn others about the pathogen. Eventually, our physician is forced to
silently treat the casualties of the epidemic, without hope of ending
it. Its an inescapable conundruma common feature of the Twilight
Zone. The National Physicians Alliance reports: Deaths due to accidental shootings are three times more common in homes with guns, 89% of accidental gun deaths among children occur in their own homes, and 73% of children under age 10 reported knowing the location of their parents firearms, while 36% admitted they had handled the weapons.6 In 2015, an American was more likely to be killed by a toddler with a gun than by a terrorist with a gun.7 In April 2015, the Annals of Internal Medicine published Firearm-Related Injury and Death in the United States: A Call to Action From 8 Health Professional Organizations and the American Bar Association.8 The call to action proposes: universal background checks, elimination of physician gag laws, improved access to mental health care, and a mechanism to report patients who are displaying signs that they might cause serious harm to themselves or others. The publication also advocates robust research about the causes and consequences of firearm violence and unintentional injuries and restrictions for civilian use on the manufacture and sale of large-capacity magazines and firearms with features designed to increase their rapid and extended killing capacity. The authors of the call to action, including the American Bar Association, designed the recommendations to be Constitutional. We may not live in a black and white Twilight Zone episode, but we do appear to live in a society in which: guns present a massive public health threat, Second Amendment freedoms often at least appear to quash all other freedoms, and elected representatives routinely appear to preferentially serve the interests of anyone and everyone making a suitable donation. As long as Americas elected representatives appear to prefer political donations over public health, our national tragedy of gunfire and lack of basic gun safety will continue. 1.http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/aug/27/nicholas-kristof/more-
americans-killed-guns-1968-all-wars-says-colu/
EVENT SIDEBAR: Join us for
January, 2008 Disaster Capitalism  by Richard Hiatt Abortion Revisited  by Phil Stahl Evolution is just a theory - like gravity   by Douglas Schrepel
December, 2007 Could the Personhood Amendment kill Christmas?   by Janet Brazill The Golden Compass  opens December 7, 2007 Read the Warnings before Taking  by Marsha Abelman
November, 2007 Reciting the Pledge  by Janet Brazill Abuse of Reason: Propaganda  by Groff Schroeder Who are the Freethinkers of Colorado Springs?  by Marsha Abelman
October, 2007 Science and the Paranormal  by Lynne Kelly The Military, Religion and Neuroscience  by Richard Hiatt Skepticism: The First Rule of Freethinking  by Louis Guzman Principles of Rationality  by Phil Stahl
September, 2007 Secrecy  by Richard Hiatt A Christian Nation?  by Groff Schroeder Play Fair on Elections  by Janet Brazill
August, 2007 Some thoughts on Separation of Church and State  Excerpted from Freethinkers by Susan Jacoby The Savior Template  by Phil Stahl Relying upon faith-based idealism  by Bob Neimanich
July, 2007 Terrorism  by Richard Hiatt Health Care: Human Right or Profit Center?  by Groff Schroeder Challenge Your Religion  by Marsha Abelman Food for Thought on Independence Day 2007 
June, 2007 Don't tell me what God thinks  by Carol Tavris Women Without Superstition  by William Edelin
May, 2007 Radical secularists agree with Jesus  by Marsha Abelman Checks and Balances  by Groff Schroeder Designing the American Burqa  by Janet Brazill
April, 2007 Lack of Cause  by Martin Foreman What is a Freethinker? by Dan Barker
March, 2007 Tombs and Miracles  by Janet Brazill Public School Professionals  by Groff Schroeder Born again Atheists  by William Edelin
February, 2007 Bring on the 'Singularity'  by Janet Brazill Does
Our God Have a Future  by Charles Hedrick A Personal Trolley in Your Future?  by Len Schwee
January, 2007 God And Stockholm Syndrome  by Jan Brazill One Commandment is Enough  by Martin Foreman First
Freedom First  by Jan Brazill The Ten Commandments are Moral Fossils  by Charlie Webb M.D.
December, 2006 Christmas Crusaders   by Jan Brazill
November, 2006 You May be a Freethinker if...  by Groff Schroeder
October, 2006 There are No Atheists in Foxholes  by David Gleeson Scientific
Atheism  by Len Schwee INTELLIGENT
DESIGN OR INTELLIGENT DECEPTION? 
by Charlie Webb MD Hell
House Terrorism  by Janet Brazill
September, 2006 Can
We Be Different?  by Groff Schroeder (first
published September 20, 2001) There are No Atheists in Foxholes  by David Gleeson Wishes  by Janet Brazill
August, 2006 Make Me a God  by Martin Foreman Some Views on the Supernatural 
July, 2006 Triumph of Reason: Statistics  by Groff Schroeder Brown's Code  by Louis Guzman None of Your Ms-ness  by Marsha Abelman The Bell Tolls  by Janet Brazill
June, 2006 God and Country  by William Edelin Where Do You Suppose Dr. Shedd Got His Opinion of Women?  Fruits of the Culture of Life  by Janet Brazill I Am a Religion Addict  by Groff Schroeder
May, 2006 The Dangers of the Hour  by Marilla M. Ricker National Day Of Prayer' Events Politicize Religion, Divide Country, Says Americans United  by Americans United for the Separation of Church and State Sex Education for the Real World  by Stephanie Sanden, RN BSN
April, 2006 Good? Evil? How can you know?  by Groff Schroeder Earthrise  by William Edelen An Easter Blockbuster  by Janet Brazill
March, 2006 Fairness for Churches  by Dr. David Eller Fear, Faith, Discrimination and Diversity  by Dr. David Eller If
Abortion Becomes a Crime  by Groff Schroeder A Marriage Proposal by Janet Brazill
February, 2006 If Limbo, why not Hell? by Janet Brazill Life of Reason: Charles Darwin by Groff Schroeder Fragile Egos by Martin Foreman Homophobic Trauma by William Edelen
January, 2006 Freethinkers Speak Across the Ages The Truth Has Not Been Tried by Len Schwee Triumph of Reason: Astronomy by Groff Schroeder
December, 2005 Subdividing and Wall Building by Marsha Abelman Its Christmas Isn't It? by David Eller Some Child Left Behind by Julianza Shavin-Katz Why can't we all be Japanese? by Martin Foreman
November, 2005 Following our Founders Vision by Janet Brazill Is America Waging a "Just" War? by Groff Schroeder
October, 2005 Triumph of Reason: Taxation by Groff Schroeder Sacred Sperm by Jan Brazill Homophobics and Leviticus by William Edelin What is a Freethinker? by Dan Barker
September, 2005 Surviving Institutional Reality by Charlie Webb Triumph of Reason: The Profession by Groff Schroeder
August, 2005 Intelligent Design or Intelligent Deception by Charlie Webb
A Woman's Worth by Jan Brazill Religious Litmus Tests by Marsha Abelman
Let Us Do the Math by Groff Schroeder Attacking the Messenger by Phil Stahl The 4th of July by William Edelen
Tell Me What You Want - What You Really, Really Want! by Marsha Abelman James Madison by John Patrick Michael Murphy Triumph of Reason: Pharmacy by Groff Schroeder
Religious Beliefs and Brain Seizures by Phil Stahl America's Number One Addiction: Drug Prohibition by Bob Wiley Is Refusing to do Your Job a Choice? by Ellen Rennels
Triumph of Reason: Government by Groff Schroeder The Da Vinci Code Effect by Jan Brazill
by David Eller
December, 2004 The Trouble
with Moral Values  by David Eller
Moral Voters 
by Jan Brazil
The Politicians 
by John Patrick Michael Murphy
August, 2004 A
Gift from God?  by Groff Schroeder
What
We Stand For  by William Edelen
Triumph of Reason:
Space Travel  by Groff Schroeder
Triumph of Reason: History
  by Groff Schroeder
Do you enjoy the "Freethought Views" column in the Colorado Springs Independent? If so, please make a donation to support the continued publication of this "advertorial" column.
|